DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB)

SONIA, SONIA (2023) DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB). S1 thesis, Hukum Pidana.

[img] Text (DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB))
TUGAS AKHIR B10018061 SONIA.pdf - Published Version
Download (788kB)
[img] Text (DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB))
COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (154kB)
[img] Text (DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB))
HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN DAN PENGESAHAN.pdf - Published Version
Download (1MB)
[img] Text (DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB))
ABSTRAK.pdf - Published Version
Download (149kB)
[img] Text (DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB))
BAB I.pdf - Published Version
Download (553kB)
[img] Text (DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB))
BAB IV.pdf - Published Version
Download (111kB)
[img] Text (DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PASAL 317 AYAT 1 KUHP (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NOMOR 194/PID.B/2020/ PN SPG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 606/PID.B/2021/PN JMB))
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version
Download (157kB)

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana dalam Pasal 317 Ayat 1 KUHP dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 194/Pid.B/2020/PN Spg dan Putusan Nomor 606/Pid.B/2021/PN Jmb. Dengan tujuan tersebut maka permasalahan yang dibahas apakah dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pemidanaan terhadap pelaku yang melakukan tindak pidana Pasal 317 Ayat 1 KUHP dalam Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 194/Pid.B/2020/PN Spg dan Putusan Nomor 606/Pid.B/2021/PN Jmb?. Dengan perumusan masalah tersebut metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif pendekatan Perundang-Perundangan (Statue Approach), Pendekatan Kasus (Case Law Approach) dan Pendekatan Konseptual (Conseptual Approach). Bahan hukum yang dikumpulkan adalah bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Analisis bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara menginventarisasi, mensistematisasi dan menginterpretasikan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dari 2 (dua) putusan terkait tindak pidana Pasal 317 Ayat 1 KUHP tentang Tindak Pidana Pengaduan Fitnah dimana pada Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 194/Pid.B/2020/PN Spg dijatuhi pidana penjara selama 2 (dua) bulan karena melanggar Pasal 317 Ayat 1 KUHP Jo. Pasal 55 Ayat 1 ke-1 KUHP seyogyanya hakim menjatuhkan pidana kurang dari satu tahun hal ini menjadi perhatian sebagaimana bahwa disparitas yang tidak relevan dikhawatirkan terjadi ketika hakim memutus besaran pidana yag rendah tanpa dasar pertimbangan yang jelas. Sedangkan Putusan Nomor 606/Pid.B/2021/PN Jmb dijatuhi pidana selama 2 (dua) tahun 4 (empat bulan) karena melanggar Pasal 317 Ayat 1 KUHP. Namun putusan Majelis Hakim penulis menilai bahwa perbuatan tindak pidana pengaduan fitnah yang dilakukan terdakwa tidak sesuai dengan unsur-unsur pada Pasal 317 Ayat 1 KUHP. Kata kunci : Pemidanaan, Pelaku, Tindak Pidana, Pengaduan Fitnah   ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing a sentence on the perpetrator of a crime in Article 317 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in Court Decision Number 194/Pid.B/2020/PN Spg and Decision Number 606/Pid.B/2021/PN Jmb. With this objective, the problem discussed is what is the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing a sentence on the perpetrator who committed the crime of Article 317 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code in Court Decision Number 194/Pid.B/2020/PN Spg and Decision Number 606/Pid.B/2021/PN Jmb? With the formulation of the problem, the research method used is normative juridical approach (Statue Approach), Case Law Approach and Conceptual Approach. The legal materials collected are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Analysis of legal materials is carried out by inventorizing, systematizing and interpreting. The results of this study indicate that of the 2 (two) decisions related to the criminal offense of Article 317 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code regarding the Crime of Slander Complaint where in Court Decision Number 194/Pid.B/2020/PN Spg was sentenced to imprisonment for 2 (two) months for violating Article 317 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code Jo. Article 55 Paragraph 1 to 1 of the Criminal Code, the judge should have imposed a sentence of less than one year. This is a concern as irrelevant disparities are feared to occur when the judge decides on a low amount of punishment without clear considerations. Meanwhile, Decision Number 606/Pid.B/2021/PN Jmb was sentenced to 2 (two) years and 4 (four months) for violating Article 317 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code. However, the decision of the Panel of Judges considered that the criminal act of slanderous denunciation committed by the defendant did not comply with the elements of Article 317 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code. Keywords: Punishment, Perpetrator, Crime, Slander Complaint

Type: Thesis (S1)
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: SONIA
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2023 07:40
Last Modified: 05 Jul 2023 07:40
URI: https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/51582

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Repository Unja is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.