abrar, abrar (2023) KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL TERHADAP PEMILIK INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK YANG MELANGGAR KESUSILAAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK. S1 thesis, universitas jambi.
![[img]](https://repository.unja.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Skripsi Abrar.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (941kB) |
|
Text
cover.pdf Download (32kB) |
|
Text
bab 1.pdf Download (535kB) |
|
Text
bab 4.pdf Download (168kB) |
|
Text
daftar pustaka.pdf Download (150kB) |
|
Text
lembar pengesahan dan lembar persetujuan.pdf Download (203kB) |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan 1) untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan terhadap pemilik informasi elektronik yang melanggar kesusilaan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik; 2) untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kebijkan kriminal ke depannya terhadap pemilik informasi elektronik yang melanggar kesusilaan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan kasus. Analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan cara menginterprestasikan, mengevaluasi dan menilai semua peraturan perundang-undangan serta menilai bahan-bahan hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) Pengaturan terhadap pemilik informasi elektronik yang melanggar kesusilaan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik tidak menggambarkan secara jelas apa yang dimaksud dengan unsur dengan sengaja dan tanpa hak? unsur mendistribusikan, mentransmisikan dan membuat dapat diaksesnya serta memiliki muatan melanggar kesusilaan. Analisa yuridis, perbuatan Baiq Nuril tidak memenuhi unsur-unsur terkait dengan tindak pidana formil dan materiil dari yang perbuatan ‘mendistribusikan, mentransmisikan dan membuat dapat diaksesnya. Konten yang tersebar tidak memenuhi memenuhi unsur "melanggar kesusilaan" dan tidak dapat dikategorikan sebagai tindakan yang melanggar kesusilaan; 2) Kebijakan kriminal ke depannya terhadap pemilik informasi elektronik yang melanggar kesusilaan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yaitu perbaikan dilakukan mulai dari revisi UU ITE, pembaruan hukum acara pidana, hingga evaluasi berkala aparat penegak hukum untuk menjamin terlindungannya korban kekerasan seksual dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Kata kunci: Kebijakan Kriminal, Pemilik Informasi Elektronik, Kesusilaan. This study aims 1) to find out and analyze the arrangements for owners of electronic information that violate decency according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions; 2) to find out and analyze future criminal policies against owners of electronic information that violate decency according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The research method used is normative juridical research method and the approach used is statutory approach and conceptual approach and case approach. Analysis of the legal materials used in this study was carried out by interpreting, evaluating and assessing all laws and regulations as well as assessing relevant legal materials. The results of the study show that 1) Regulations for owners of electronic information that violate decency that Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions does not clearly describe what is meant by elements intentionally and without rights? elements of distributing, transmitting and making accessible as well as having content violating decency. Juridical analysis, Baiq Nuril's actions do not meet the elements related to the formal and material crime of the act of 'distributing, transmitting and making accessible. The distributed content does not fulfill the element of "violating decency" and cannot be categorized as an act that violates decency; 2) Criminal policies in the future against owners of electronic information that violate decency according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, namely improvements made starting from the revision of the ITE Law, renewal of criminal procedural law, to periodic evaluations of law enforcement officials to ensure the protection of victims of sexual violence in the criminal justice system.
| Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | This study aims 1) to find out and analyze the arrangements for owners of electronic information that violate decency according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions; 2) to find out and analyze future criminal policies against owners of electronic information that violate decency according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The research method used is normative juridical research method and the approach used is statutory approach and conceptual approach and case approach. Analysis of the legal materials used in this study was carried out by interpreting, evaluating and assessing all laws and regulations as well as assessing relevant legal materials. The results of the study show that 1) Regulations for owners of electronic information that violate decency that Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions does not clearly describe what is meant by elements intentionally and without rights? elements of distributing, transmitting and making accessible as well as having content violating decency. Juridical analysis, Baiq Nuril's actions do not meet the elements related to the formal and material crime of the act of 'distributing, transmitting and making accessible. The distributed content does not fulfill the element of "violating decency" and cannot be categorized as an act that violates decency; 2) Criminal policies in the future against owners of electronic information that violate decency according to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, namely improvements made starting from the revision of the ITE Law, renewal of criminal procedural law, to periodic evaluations of law enforcement officials to ensure the protection of victims of sexual violence in the criminal justice system. |
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | ABRAR |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2023 04:00 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Jul 2023 04:00 |
| URI: | https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/53806 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
