Studi Putusan Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar Tentang Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Diperoleh Berdasarkan Perjanjian Nominee

Amar, Nazwa (2025) Studi Putusan Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar Tentang Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Diperoleh Berdasarkan Perjanjian Nominee. S1 thesis, Universitas Jambi.

	Text COVER.pdf Download (314kB)
	Text HALAMAN PENGESAHAN.pdf Download (608kB)
	Text ABSTRAK.pdf Download (147kB)
	Text BAB I.pdf Download (351kB)
	Text BAB IV.pdf Download (119kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (136kB)
	Text FULL SKRIPSI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis hak pemilik atas tanah akibat perjanjian nominee Putusan Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar dan upaya hukum pemilik atas tanah akibat perjanjian nominee. Permasalahan yang dibahas meliputi: (1) Bagaimana hak pemilik atas tanah akibat perjanjian nominee pasca Putusan Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar? (2) Bagaimana Upaya hukum pemilik atas tanah akibat perjanjian nominee pasca Putusan Nomor 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif (studi kasus). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa para pihak atas tanah kehilangan haknya karna perjanjian nominee yang menjadi dasar pembelian tanah sengketa tersebut bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yaitu Pasal 1320 KUHPer dan UUPA, serta upaya penyelesaian sengketa yaitu dengan melakukan mediasi. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the rights of land owners due to nominee agreements in Decision Number 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar and the legal remedies of land owners due to nominee agreements. The problems discussed include: (1) What are the rights of land owners due to nominee agreements after Decision Number 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar? (2) What are the legal remedies of land owners due to nominee agreements after Decision Number 137/Pdt.G/2021/PN Gianyar. The method used in this study is normative juridical (case study). The results of the study indicate that the parties to the land lost their rights because the nominee agreement which was the basis for the purchase of the disputed land was contrary to statutory regulations, namely Article 1320 of the Civil Code and the UUPA, and efforts to resolve disputes were through mediation.

Type:	Thesis (S1)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Nominee Agreement, Land Ownership Rights, Dispute Resolution
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	AMAR
Date Deposited:	12 Jun 2025 04:29
Last Modified:	12 Jun 2025 04:29
URI:	https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/79684

Actions (login required)

View Item