ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 647 K/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2021 MENGENAI PERUSAHAAN ASURANSI YANG PAILIT

JANUR PUTRI, ANANDA MAPRILIA (2025) ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 647 K/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2021 MENGENAI PERUSAHAAN ASURANSI YANG PAILIT. S1 thesis, Hukum Bisnis.

	Text ANANDA MAPRILIA JANUR PUTRI-B1A121366-BEBAS PUSTAKA UNIVERSITAS.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (7MB)
	Text COVER.pdf Download (23kB)
	Text PERSETUJUAN SKRIPSI.docx Download (21kB)
	Text PENGESAHAN SKRIPSI NEW.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text ABSTRAK.pdf Download (191kB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Download (589kB)
	Text BAB 4.pdf Download (185kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (410kB)

Abstract

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dari segi yuridis, filosofis, dan sosiologis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2021. Rumusan masalah pada penelitian ini adalah, Bagaimana analisis yuridis, filosofis, dan sosiologis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2021. Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian yuridis-normatif. Hasil penelitian berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 bahwa, dikarenakan kedua putusan yang menjadi dasar diajukannya permohonan homologasi dalam perkara ini yakni Putusan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) telah salah maka seluruh putusan dalam perkara a quo menjadi cacat dan harus dinyatakan batal oleh Mahkamah Agung. Bahwa terdapat kekosongan hukum dalam proses pengajuan permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU), dalam perkara perusahaan asuransi PT. Asuransi Jiwa Kresna, sehingga dapat diterapkan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 menunjukan pentingnya pemahaman mengenai kedudukan hukum dalam konteks kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) di Indonesia. Kata Kunci : Perusahaan Asuransi, Kepailitan, Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2021 ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze from a juridical, philosophical, and sociological perspective the Supreme Court Decision No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2021. The formulation of the problem in this study is, How is the juridical, philosophical, and sociological analysis of the Supreme Court Decision No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021. This research uses a juridical-normative type of research. The results of the research based on the Supreme Court Decision No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2021 that, because the two decisions that are the basis for submitting the homologation application in this case, namely the Decision on Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), have been wrong, all decisions in the a quo case are defective and must be declared null and void by the Supreme Court. That there is a legal vacuum in the process of submitting an application for Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), in the case of the insurance company PT. Krishna Life Insurance, so that the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali can be applied. The Supreme Court Decision No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 shows the importance of understanding the legal position in the context of bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) in Indonesia. Keywords: Insurance Company, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court Decision No. 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021

Type:	Thesis (S1)
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LC Special aspects of education > LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	ANANDA MAPRILIA JANUR PUTRI
Date Deposited:	30 Jun 2025 07:02
Last Modified:	30 Jun 2025 07:02
URI:	https://repository.unja.ac.id/id/eprint/80683

Actions (login required)

View Item